HR Stream page 404 of 518

5175 articles are classified in All Articles > HR Stream


Change to flexible arrangement not discriminatory: Tribunal

A tribunal has found that an employer's failure to formalise an employee's flexible work arrangements to meet her caring responsibilities led to her seeing them as an entitlement rather than a privilege, and any attempts to change them as workplace bullying.



Pregnant employee's redundancy not adverse action: court

An employee made redundant while pregnant has lost her adverse action case, with the Federal Circuit Court accepting a business downturn was behind her job loss, and rejecting her claim that her employer became hostile to her because she wouldn't commit to taking only six months parental leave.

Overseas redeployment not reasonable: FWC

The Fair Work Commission has rejected an employee's claim that his redundancy was not genuine because his company should have redeployed him overseas.

Refusing unlawful directions not exercising workplace right: Court

An employee sacked for refusing to carry out directions he claimed would put him in breach of state law has lost his adverse action case, with a court ruling that while he was entitled to refuse to perform the work, he was not exercising a workplace right.

Intimate text messages between consenting adults ruled inadmissible

Sexually explicit text messages between two colleagues in a relationship were found to be inadmissible in an adverse action case because it couldn't be concluded that the "author would be likely to replicate in the workplace the content, tone or subject of text messages which were indisputably intended to remain private".

Seeking legal advice is a workplace right: Federal Court

The Federal Court has ruled that a betting agency employee's ability to seek legal advice about unpaid commissions was a "workplace right" and that when she threatened to exercise it, her employer took adverse action against her by threatening to sack her.


Sacking train driver was adverse action: Court

The Federal Circuit Court has found a rail company took unlawful adverse action when it dismissed a locomotive driver who became sick and anxious and couldn't go through with a competency assessment six weeks after he was involved in a crash.